How to Test Cannabis Seeds for Pathogens: A Grower’s Guide

Seed health plays a vital role in successful cannabis cultivation. By verifying mother plant health, sourcing seeds strategically, and using statistical sampling for testing, growers can make informed decisions that support plant vigor, yield, and long-term soil health.

Best Practices for Testing Cannabis Seeds for Pathogens

Testing cannabis seeds for harmful pathogens before planting is a critical step in ensuring a successful and profitable harvest. Undetected seed-borne diseases can lead to poor germination, stunted growth, and long-term soil contamination, making proactive testing an essential part of any grower's strategy. To maximize the effectiveness of seed testing, cultivators should follow these best practices.

Verify the Health of Mother Plants

The first step in seed testing is gathering information from the seed supplier. Growers should inquire whether the mother plants that produced the seeds were tested for pathogens, which specific pathogens were tested for, when the testing was conducted, and which laboratory performed the analysis. Requesting actual test results ensures transparency and helps growers assess the potential risks associated with a given seed batch. A reputable seed producer should be able to provide this data and demonstrate a commitment to pathogen-free production.

Source Seeds from a Limited Number of Mother Plants

Whenever possible, growers should source seeds that originate from a minimal number of mother plants. This practice reduces the overall risk of pathogen transmission and increases the likelihood that a pathogen, if present, will be detected through PCR testing. Seed producers who divide their seed lots according to specific mother plants can further minimize losses if a pathogen is detected in a particular batch. By maintaining traceability, seed producers and growers alike can isolate infected lots, preventing further spread while preserving healthy seed stocks.

Understand the Statistical Approach to Seed Testing

Seed testing is not about testing every single seed in a batch; rather, it is about testing a statistically significant subset to provide confidence that a given pathogen is absent. Most testing is conducted to ensure, with 95% confidence, that if a pathogen is not found in the tested subset, it is unlikely to be present in the entire population. Determining the number of seeds that need to be tested requires statistical calculations. To simplify this process, we have created a seed testing calculator and detailed instructions that growers can use to determine the appropriate sample size based on their desired confidence level and pathogen occurrence rates.

Want to take the guesswork out of seed testing? Use our Seed Testing Calculator to determine the optimal sample size for your batch—quick, easy, and backed by science. Or consider using our Clone Testing Calculator.

The Power of Proactive Cannabis Seed Testing

Testing your seeds before planting is a simple way to set yourself up for a successful grow. By checking where your seeds come from, making sure the mother plants were healthy, and testing a good sample size, you can avoid a lot of headaches down the line. A little effort upfront can save you time, money, and stress—helping you grow strong, healthy plants and get the best possible harvest.

Cannabis facility

Start strong with healthy seeds

A simple pathogen test can help you avoid poor germination, weak plants, and unexpected losses—saving you time and money in the long run.

References

  1. Adkar-Purushothama, Charith Raj, Teruo Sano, and Jean-Pierre Perreault. "Hop latent viroid: A hidden threat to the cannabis industry." Viruses 15.3 (2023): 681.

  2. Punja, Zamir K., et al. "Symptomology, prevalence, and impact of Hop latent viroid on greenhouse-grown cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) plants in Canada." Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 46.2 (2024): 174-197.

  3. Mehle N, Gutiérrez-Aguirre I, Prezelj N, Delic D, Vidic U, Ravnikar M. Survival and transmission of potato virus Y, pepino mosaic virus, and potato spindle tuber viroid in water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Feb;80(4):1455-62. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03349-13. Epub 2013 Dec 13. PMID: 24334672; PMCID: PMC3911042.

  4. Punja ZK, Kahl D, Reade R, Xiang Y, Munz J, Nachappa P. Challenges to Cannabis sativaProduction from Pathogens and Microbes-The Role of Molecular Diagnostics and Bioinformatics. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 19;25(1):14. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010014. PMID: 38203190; PMCID: PMC10779078

  5. Atallah OO, Yassin SM, Verchot J. New Insights into Hop Latent Viroid Detection, Infectivity, Host Range, and Transmission. Viruses. 2023 Dec 23;16(1):30. doi: 10.3390/v16010030. PMID: 38257731; PMCID: PMC10819085.

  6. Rivedal HM, Funke CN, Frost KE. An Overview of Pathogens Associated with Biotic Stresses in Hemp Crops in Oregon, 2019 to 2020. Plant Dis. 2022 May;106(5):1334-1340. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2415-SR. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PMID: 34894753.

  7. Melgarejo TA, Chen LF, Rojas MR, Schilder A, Gilbertson RL. Curly Top Disease of Hemp (Cannabis sativa) in California Is Caused by Mild-Type Strains of Beet curly top virus Often in Mixed Infection. Plant Dis. 2022 Dec;106(12):3022-3026. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-22-0856-SC. Epub 2022 Nov 17. PMID: 35549320.

  8. Anabestani, A.; Behjatnia, S.A.A.; Izadpanah, K.; Tabein, S.; Accotto, G.P. Seed Transmission of Beet Curly Top Virus and Beet Curly Top Iran Virus in a Local Cultivar of Petunia in Iran. Viruses 2017, 9, 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9100299

  9. Ellison S. First Report of Tobacco Streak Virus in Cannabis sativa in New York. Plant Dis. 2023 Dec 19. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1810-PDN. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38115564.

  10.  Chiginsky, Judith & Langemeier, Kaitlyn & MacWilliams, Jacob & Albrecht, Tessa & Cranshaw, Whitney & Fulladolsa, Ana & Kapuscinski, Marylee & Stenglein, Mark & Nachappa, Punya. (2021). First Insights Into the Virus and Viroid Communities in Hemp (Cannabis sativa). Frontiers in Agronomy. 3. 10.3389/fagro.2021.778433. 

  11. Sharman M, Persley DM, Thomas JE. Distribution in Australia and Seed Transmission of Tobacco streak virus in Parthenium hysterophorus. Plant Dis. 2009 Jul;93(7):708-712. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-7-0708. PMID: 30764380.

  12. Kegler H., Spaar D. On the Virus Susceptibility of Varieties of Cannabis sativa L. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 1997;30:457–464. doi: 10.1080/03235409709383198

  13. Li J, Shang Q, Luo Y, Wei S, Zhao C, Ban L. Transmission from seed to seedling and elimination of alfalfa viruses. Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jun 6;15:1330219. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1330219. PMID: 38903432; PMCID: PMC11187482.

  14. Hadad L, Luria N, Smith E, Sela N, Lachman O, Dombrovsky A. Lettuce Chlorosis Virus Disease: A New Threat to Cannabis Production. Viruses. 2019 Aug 29;11(9):802. doi: 10.3390/v11090802. PMID: 31470681; PMCID: PMC6784094

  15. Righetti, L., Paris, R., Ratti, C., Calassanzio, M., Onofri, C., Calzolari, D., Menzel, W., Knierim, D., Magagnini, G., Pacifico, D., & Grassi, G. (2018). Not the one, but the only one: about Cannabis cryptic virus in plants showing 'hemp streak' disease symptoms. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 150(3), 575–588

  16. McPartland, J. M., Clarke, R. C., & Watson, D. P. (2000). Hemp diseases and pests: Management and biological control. CABI Publishing.

  17. Jarugula, S., Wagstaff, C., Mitra, A., Crowder, D. W., Gang, D. R., and Naidu, R. A. 2023. First reports of Beet curly top virus, Citrus yellow vein-associated virus, and Hop latent viroid in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) in Washington State. Plant Dis. 107:2897. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-22-2981-PD LinkGoogle Scholar

  18. Y. Zhou, H.M. Chen, X.F. Wang, Z.A. Li, M. Tang, C.Y.Zhou. Lack of evidence for seed transmission of Citrus yellow vein clearing virus despite its frequent detection in seed tissues. J Plant Pathol, 97 (2015), pp. 519-521

  19. Sanche, S. E., Sutton, D. A., & Rinaldi, M. G. (2003). Dematiaceous fungi. In E. J. Anaissie, M. R. McGinnis, & M. A. Pfaller (Eds.), Clinical mycology (pp. 367–394). Churchill Livingstone.

  20. Punja ZK, Collyer D, Scott C, Lung S, Holmes J, Sutton D. Pathogens and Molds Affecting Production and Quality of Cannabis sativa L. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 17;10:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01120. PMID: 31681341; PMCID: PMC6811654.

  21. Gwinn, K. D., Hansen, Z., Kelly, H., & Ownley, B. H. (2022). Diseases of Cannabis sativa caused by diverse Fusarium species. Frontiers in Agronomy, 3, Article 796062.

  22. Sorrentino, R., Lahoz, E., Battaglia, V., Sorrentino, M. C., & Cerrato, D. (2023). First report of seedling damping-off of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) caused by seed-transmitted Alternaria rosae in Italy. Plant Disease, 107(1), 1636.

  23.  Dumigan, C. R., & Deyholos, M. K. (2022). Cannabis seedlings inherit seed-borne bioactive and anti-fungal endophytic bacilli. Plants, 11(16), 2127

  24. Summerell, B. A., Salleh, B., & Leslie, J. F. (2003). A utilitarian approach to Fusarium identification. Plant Disease, 87(2), 117–128

  25. Tiourebaev, K. S., Paulitz, T. C., & Mukhambetzhanov, S. K. (1997). First report of Fusarium oxysporum on Cannabis sativa in Kazakhstan. Plant Disease, 81(10), 1212.

  26. Roberts, R. G., & Punja, Z. K. (2021). The Fusarium solani species complex infecting cannabis (Cannabis sativa L., marijuana) plants and a first report of Fusarium (Cylindrocarpon) lichenicola causing root and crown rot. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 43(4), 567–581

  27. Crosier, W. F. “RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI IN SEEDS OF SMALL GRAINS AND OTHER PLANTS.” Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts, vol. 58, 1968, pp. 111–17. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23432233

  28. Schoener, Laura, and Shouhua Wang. "Hemp abnormal growth is attributed to mono-, di-, or tri-infections of Spiroplasma citri, 'Candidatus Phytoplasma trifolii', and beet curly top virus." PhytoFrontiers (2023)

  29. Rivedal HM, Temple TN, Thomas W, Ocamb C, Funke C, Skillman V, Jones G, Shrestha G, Kc A, Dung JKS, Frost K. First report of Spiroplasma citri associated with disease symptoms in field-grown hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Dis. 2023 Sep 8. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-23-1419-PDN. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37682222

  30. Satta, E., Calari, A., and A. Bertaccini. "Phytoplasma Transmission through Seeds: A Critical Review." Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 9.1 (2019): 87–96.

  31. Raj, S.K., Snehi, S.K., Khan, M.S., and Kumar, S. 'Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' (group 16SrI) associated with a witches'-broom disease of Cannabis sativa in India. 2008. Plant Pathology 57(6):1173.

  32. Hu J. First Report of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma trifolii' Related Strain Associated with Yellowing and Witches'-Broom of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa) in Arizona. Plant Dis. 2021 May 25. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-21-0847-PDN. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34032489.

  33. Rivedal HM, Temple TN, Thomas W, Ocamb C, Funke C, Skillman V, Jones G, Shrestha G, Kc A, Dung JKS, Frost K. First report of Spiroplasma citri associated with disease symptoms in field-grown hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Dis. 2023 Sep 8. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-23-1419-PDN. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37682222


About TUMI Genomics

TUMI Genomics is a biotechnology company specializing in advanced pathogen detection and genomic solutions. Their flagship product, the TUMIGlow on-site testing device, is designed to support agricultural industries with precise, efficient, and reliable testing technology.

Media Contact: Hailey Spencer, Marketing Director

hailey@tumigenomics.com


Sales Inquiries: Luke Horst, Sales Director

luke@tumigenomics.com


 
Previous
Previous

Bleach Treatment for Cannabis Seed Sterilization

Next
Next

Pathogen Testing Matters: 5 Risks of Planting Untested Cannabis Seeds